Alright, so I can reveal that I’m covering this year’s F1 car launches with Race Fans (formerly F1 Fanatic). I have collaborated with them before and it’s a genuinely great site with bang up to date information (and Dieter Rencken is a columnist on there this year too). I’ll link my pieces below, updating this post as they are released:
Haas VF-18 – Draws a lot of influence from last year’s Ferrari while furthering its own concepts around the bargeboard area
Williams FW41 – Paddy Lowe spearheads an aggressive change in design philosophy, both mechanically and aerodynamically
Red Bull RB14 – Returning back to their classic design ethos of tight internal packaging could pay huge dividends in 2018
Sauber C37 – Arguably the best looking car on the grid, their innovative approach to cooling could make or break their season
Renault R.S.18 – Don’t be fooled by the launch photos, the R.S.18 is an all-new car from the ground up
Mercedes W09 – Reworked rear suspension and beautifully refined bodywork should reduce the inconsistent performances of 2017
Ferrari SF71H – A promising evolution of last year’s title contender with impressively narrow bodywork achieved through clever duct work
McLaren MCL33 – Renault power now accompanies a very good chassis, featuring clean aerodynamics and revised rear suspension
Toro Rosso STR13 – Outwardly similar to last year’s car, the new STR has had to accommodate a big change internally – the Honda PU
Force India VJM11 – With an extensive aerodynamic package expected for Melbourne, this analysis reviews the little details that have been added
I don’t know about you but since the news that Red Bull’s F1 design guru Adrian Newey was teaming up with Aston Martin for a ‘new project’, I’ve been waiting with bated breath for what kind of machine the two could produce together. Despite the lengthy wait, nothing could quite prepare any of us for what we saw when the AM-RB 001 prototype was showcased in early July.
Once launched the codename will be changed to something more elegant (and probably beginning with a ‘V’) but no doubt the bold body shapes that make it the eye catching will remain. It’s a little Marmite (personally I love it) however every carbon fibre-formed surface has been meticulously sculpted on CAE software to produce a car that meets Newey’s intense focus on aerodynamics. Continue reading →
As you may (or may not) know, all of my technical analysis pieces for the 2016 F1 cars are up on F1 Fanatic this year. However I’ve made it really easy for you to find your favourite car/team by linking them all in this post! So here you are – enjoy!
Mercedes W07 – Can the World Champions continue their winning streak?
Ferrari SF16-H – Ferrari’s bold winter strategy could bring them a step closer to the Mercs
Williams FW38 – The FW38 is arguably the most important car for Williams in a long time
Red Bull RB12 – 2016 may be a stop-gap for the Bulls, but don’t discount them for a podium
Force India VJM09 – Will Force India be able to keep pace with the bigger budget teams?
Renault R.S.16 – It’s Renault’s first year back as a Constructor, so how will the R.S.16 fare?
Toro Rosso STR11 – Arguably the boldest car on the grid, Toro Rosso mean business in 2016
Sauber C35 – Sauber have their eyes on 2017, but the C35 is nonetheless a solid evolution
I’ve talked a lot about the aerodynamic and power unit components of a Formula 1 car on this blog, but rarely touched on the raw mechanical systems that are also critical to performance. There’s a reason for this, though – it’s all a bit voodoo. There are plenty of theories behind proper suspension geometry for a race car, however it becomes much more complex to analyse these mechanics at F1 level as downforce – the biggest performance differentiator in the sport – plays an important role in the design calculations.
For this blog post I am going to run over some of the important aspects of suspension geometry and the factors involved (e.g. centre of gravity, aerodynamic downforce). Continue reading →
It’s been a while (exams have got in the way), but I’ve finally managed to put some new content together! In the following video I discuss why the 2017 regulation changes may not be as good as we first thought.
This is only my second proper video so I’m really keen for your thoughts on whether I should do more (or not), or any topics you might what to know about in the future. Please let me know in the comments on this post, or on YouTube or tweet me!